After a while, it was
reported that a chief gardener ( really an estate manager ), Joseph Paxton , had constructed a conservatory for tropical plants-a greenhouse-
all of iron and glass. A meeting was arranged where Paxton proposed to Prince
Albert a vast greenhouse of similar construction for the exhibition. Despite
uncertainties and protests, Paxton’s proposal was finally accepted and
constructed with the aid of the engineering firm of Fox and Henderson.
Partial elevations of Crystal Palace |
Joseph Paxton’s first sketch
|
As they were discovering new
materials and ways of construction, the building, soon known as the Crystal
Palace, was made up of iron frames, columns and girders produced in quantity as
a foundry, bolted together on site, and glazed with sheets of factory-made
glass. It was unlike anything ever built before: a vast internal space (it was
1,851 feet long and had an area of more than 800,000 square feet ) with
structural elements so slim as to be almost negligible, glass walls and roof. What made Paxton's design so
innovative is, in my opinion, his modular, hierarchical design that reflected
his practical brilliance as a designer and problem-solver. It incorporated many
breakthroughs, offered practical advantages that no conventional building could
match and, above all, embodied the spirit of British innovation and industrial
might that the Great Exhibition was intended to celebrate.
Paxton was able to design and build the largest glass structure yet created, from scratch, in less than a year, and complete it on schedule and on budget. He was even able to alter the design shortly before building began, adding a high, barrel-vaulted transept across the centre of the bulding, at 90 degrees to the main gallery, under which he was able to safely enclose several large elm trees that would otherwise have had to be felled- thereby also resolving a controversial issue that had been a major sticking point for the vocal anti-Exhibition lobby.
Paxton was able to design and build the largest glass structure yet created, from scratch, in less than a year, and complete it on schedule and on budget. He was even able to alter the design shortly before building began, adding a high, barrel-vaulted transept across the centre of the bulding, at 90 degrees to the main gallery, under which he was able to safely enclose several large elm trees that would otherwise have had to be felled- thereby also resolving a controversial issue that had been a major sticking point for the vocal anti-Exhibition lobby.
Interior of the Crystal Palace |
The airy interior was greatly
admired by the crowds that attended the exhibition, so that, when the time came
to remove the building, it was decided to dismantle it and reassemble it in
Sydenham, then on the edge of London. It stood there until 1936 when it was
destroyed by a fire.
Furthermore, the Crystal
Palace appears in every architectural history as the first fully realized
achievement of what, much later, came to be called modernism.
As a conclusion, the geometry of the Crystal Palace was clearly a classic example of the concept of form following function: the shape and size of the whole building were directly based around the size of the panes of glass made by the supplier. Thus, the entire building was scaled around those dimensions, it had a grid, which means that nearly the whole outer surface could be glazed using millions of identical panes, thereby drastically reducing both their production cost and the time needed to install them.
As a conclusion, the geometry of the Crystal Palace was clearly a classic example of the concept of form following function: the shape and size of the whole building were directly based around the size of the panes of glass made by the supplier. Thus, the entire building was scaled around those dimensions, it had a grid, which means that nearly the whole outer surface could be glazed using millions of identical panes, thereby drastically reducing both their production cost and the time needed to install them.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario