martes, 24 de marzo de 2015

Mies Van der Rohe; Farnsworth House

Farnsworth House






Designed by Mies van der Rohe in 1945 and constructed in 1951, the Farnsworth House is a vital part of American iconography, an exemplary representation of both the International Style of architecture as well as the modern movement’s desire to juxtapose the sleek, streamline design of Modern structure with the organic environment of the surrounding nature.



Edith Farnsworth, a brilliant doctor, first met Mies at a cocktail party in Chicago. Familiar with his work, she asked if he would design a small weekend retreat for her on the banks of the Fox River in Piano, IL. Upon visiting the 64-acre site, largely within a flood plain, Mies perceived the true power already present within the natural landscape. Thus began his quest for a transparent structure that would minimize the boundary between man and the natural world. With an open floor plan of only 2400 square feet, he created three distinct spatial interfaces: a transparent house, a covered terrace, and an open deck.

With two parallel planes held in suspension between the earth and sky by only eight steel columns (the I-beams of the Farnsworth House are both structural and expressive), the house’s structure consists of precast concrete floor and roof slabs supported by a carefully crafted steel skeleton frame of beams, girders and columns. The facade is made of single panes of glass spanning from floor to ceiling, fastened to the structural system by steel mullions. The building is heated by radiant coils set in the concrete floor; natural cross ventilation and the shade of nearby trees provide minimal cooling. Mies worked through 167 drawings to come to his final, fearless design.Like Einstein’s equation, its simplicity exudes an elegance through a thorough attention to detail. However, Mies did not create the Farnsworth House to be an iconic glass box viewed from afar. Rather, he hoped to create a space through which life unfolds both independently and interdependently with nature.






Relationship to Landscape


The house faces the Fox River just to the south and is raised 5 feet 3 inches above the ground, its thin, white I-beam supports contrasting with the darker, sinuous trunks of the surrounding trees. The calm stillness of the man-made object contrasts also with the subtle movements, sounds, and rhythms of water, sky and vegetation.




At the same time, the prismatic composition of the house maintains a sense of boundary and centrality against the vegetative landscape, thus maintaining its temple-like aloofness. The great panes of glass redefine the character of the boundary between shelter and that which is outside. The exterior glazing and the intermittent partitions of the interior work together dialectically, shifting the viewer’s awareness between the thrill of exposure to the raw elements of nature and the comforting stability of architectonic enclosure.







Le Corbusier: Unite d'Habitation space distribution

In 1947, Europe was still feeling the effects of the Second World War, when Le Corbusier was commissioned to design a multi-family residential housing project for the people of Marseille that were dislocated after the bombings on France. 

The Unite d’ Habitation was actually the first of a new housing project series for Le Corbusier,  a challenge regarding the ways in which he had to approach such a large complex to accommodate roughly 1,600 residents. Probably, related to this project the first idea would be to design something horizontally spreading out over the landscape, but Le Corbusier designed the COMMUNITY that one would encounter in a neighborhood within a mixed use, modernist, residential high rise. He wanted the people to come together in a “ vertical garden city “.

This idea was based on bringing the villa within a larger volume that allowed for the inhabitants to have their own private spaces, but outside of that private sector they would shop, eat, exercise, and gather together.

With 337 apartments arranged over 12 stories, suspended on large pillars, divided among eighteen floors, the design requires an innovative approach toward spatial organization to accommodate the living spaces, as well as the public, communal spaces. Inside, corridors run through the centre of the long axis of every third floor of the building, with each apartment lying on two levels, and stretching from one side of the building to the other, with a balcony that allows for cross ventilation throughout the unit flowing through the narrow bedrooms into the double height space; emphasizing an open volume rather than an open plan.
Unlike most housing projects that have a “double-stacked” corridor (a single hallway with units on either side), Le Corbusier designed the units to span from each side of the building, as well as having a double height living space reducing the number of required corridors to one every three floors.  By narrowing the units and allowing for a double height space, Corbusier is capable of efficiently placing more units in the building and creating an interlocking system of residential volumes. Interestingly enough, the majority of the communal aspects are placed on the roof, which becomes a garden terrace that has a running track, a club, a kindergarten, a gym, and a shallow pool.  Beside the roof, there are shops, medical facilities, and even a small hotel distributed throughout the interior of the building.

For me personally, Corbusier’s design resembles the idea of the Tetrix game, where the volumes are interconnecting, occupying the smallest space possible and this makes Unite d’Habitation one of the most innovative architectural responses to a residential building.  It is definitely a significant, inspiring and successful design due to the Modular proportions that Corbusier established during the project.  In conclusion Unite d’ Habitation is essentially a “city within a city” that is spatially, as well as, functionally optimized for the residents.








The Villa Tugendhat, by Mies van der Rohe


Located in the city of Brno, about 200km from Prague, in Austria, the recently married couple Grete and Fritz Tugendhat received the land of 2000m² as a wedding gift from the bride’s father, an influential textile manufacturer, Alfred Löw-Beer. They decided to give Ludwig Mies van der Rohe free rein over the design and construction of their villa.
It was a revolutionary flat-roofed villa containing an iron framework, that allowed the architect to dispense with supporting walls, and enveloped by glass windows that helped to create a flowing interior swimming in space and light, and featuring a thick onyx interior wall that changes colour in winter months when hit by the sun at certain angles.
Modernist architecture is often associated with austere office buildings and anonymous apartment blocks, but a walk through the Tugendhat Villa shows how modernist ideas could inspire unparalleled domestic luxury: over eight decades since its completion, this iconic work has undergone a complicated development as a building both in terms of its structure and the socio-political circumstances surrounding it. Indeed, the ultramodern construction has been many things: a family home, Gestapo headquarters, a dance school, a clinic,  and the subject of a novel.
Spread out over three levels, which seem to disappear into the slope of a hill overlooking the city, the enormous, 2600m² house featured pieces of specially designed furniture that are now icons of 20th century design ( the Tugendhat chair and the Brno chair are still in production.) There were no paintings or decorative items in the villa but the interior was by no means boring, due to the use of naturally patterned materials such as the onyx wall and rare tropical woods.
The location of the structure, its location in relation to the sun, the layout of the spaces and the construction materials are the essential factors for creating a dwelling house,” said Mies van der Rohe in 1924 when designing the villa. “A building organism must be created out of these conditions

Built of reinforced concrete, Villa Tugendhat soon became an icon of modernism. The 3 storey house became famous as one of the pioneering prototypes of modern architecture – in terms of the structural system, layout, interior furnishing, services and the integration of the building into the natural environment.
The innovative and progressive design of the house is immediately apparent upon entry. It’s easy to forget that it was built in the late twenties because it feels like a building from a later decade. You enter at the top and descend into the large open living space. This inversion of traditional design is the least of Mies’ departures from conventional architecture. The architect presented the completed design for the villa by the end of 1928. His design was based on the concept of Germany’s pavilion for the international exhibition in Barcelona, which he adapted to the needs of his customers in Brno.
The uniqueness of the design lies in the use of a steel support structure (the first time it had been used for a detached house), which enabled unlimited ways of handling the interiors as well as the generous glazing of the facade. The design produces the free-flowing space in the main residential hall and its merging with the exterior through large sliding windows.
His revolutionary approach started with the support. Twenty-nine steel columns hold up the house. This frame eliminates the need for load-bearing walls in the living area, so it is open, light, and spacious. The columns, still in their original stainless steel casings – now polished to a mirror shine, also form part of the interior decor.
The 3 levels villa is set on a slope and its main living spaces face southwest towards the garden.
The first floor, the basement, contains the utility facilities.
The second floor, the ground floor consists of the main living and social areas with the conservatory and the terrace
as well as the kitchen with facilities along with the servants’ rooms.
The third floor, the first floor, has the main entrance from the street with a passage to the terrace, the entrance hall, the rooms for the parents, children and the nanny with appropriate facilities. The chauffeur’s flat with the garages and the terrace are accessible separately.
Therefore, the street facade consists only of the third level with a gracefully sunk entrance door and the garage with the chauffeur’s apartment, the volume of which on the entrance terrace frames a view of the city with their shared roof.
The entrance hall leads to the bedrooms of the parents, children and governess; these rooms also have access to the upper terrace overlooking the garden.
A spiral staircase descends to the second floor with the flowing living space, which, owing to the generous glazing and conservatory, visually merges with the exterior. The villa’s individual functional zones are merely hinted by impressive partitions or curtains.
The dining corner is separated from the rest of the free space by a round ebony screen; the study and the sitting space are separated by a wall of Moroccan onyx which colours the room red at sunset.
The architect designed the interior furnishings along with his collaborators Lilly Reich, Hermann John and Sergio Ruegenberg; these involve bent tubular furniture (the Brno chair, the Tugendhat and Barcelona armchairs) and built-in wooden furniture from fine hardwoods manufactured by Jan Vanek’s interior design company Standard. The highlights of the entire residential space involve its technical equipment including the ingenious air conditioning system which cleans the air and freshens it with sea salt and the large windows in metal frames, which can be fully rolled down into the floor. The dining area provides direct access to the terrace with the staircase and the garden designed by Mies and Brno garden designer Markéta Roderová-Müllerová. The service areas of the villa are accessible via a separate entrance from the street and consist of the kitchen and domestic staff rooms on the second floor as well as vast technical facilities on the ground floor. The construction of the plastered structure consists of a steel skeleton, reinforced concrete ceilings and brick masonry.
The subtle supporting columns of a cross-shaped profile are anchored in concrete bases and partially lead through the masonry and partially through the spaces of all the floors. Shiny chrome classing is employed in the living area.

The individual functional zones within the area are divided up by the wall from honey and yellow coloured onyx with white veins from the foothills of the Atlas in Morocco and the half-circular wall originally from Macassar ebony wood mined on the island of Celebes in south-east Asia. An additional separate room could be entered through drawing back curtains made from shantung silk and velvet. The most prominent feature of the ‘flowing’ living area was the grand seating arrangement in front of the onyx wall and the dining room demarcated by the half-cylinder from Makassar ebony. The interior could be connected up with the garden through suspension of the two large window panes.
The office with the library and the adjoining winter garden was behind the onyx wall. Behind the ebony curved wall was a seating area next to a wall from milk glass which could be lit up.

It was completed in December 1930 when the Tugendhats finally moved into the house.

sábado, 21 de marzo de 2015

clase4_Mies van der Rohe director de la Bauhaus

Ludwig Mies van der Rohe era hijo de Michael y Amalie (Rohe), cuarto hijo de una familia católica. En 1900 empezó a trabajar en el taller de escultura de piedras de su padre y en 1905 se trasladó a Berlín para colaborar en el estudio de arquitectura de Bruno Paul.
En 1907 realiza su primera obra, la casa Riehl. De 1908 a 1911 trabajó en el despacho de Peter Behrens, del cual Mies desarrolló un estilo arquitectónico basado en técnicas estructurales avanzadas y en el clasicismo prusiano. También realizó diseños innovadores con acero y vidrio. En 1911 dirigió la construcción de la embajada alemana en San Petersburgo. En ese mismo año se mudó a La Haya y planificó una casa de campo para el matrimonio Kröller-Müller.

En 1912 abrió con mucho esfuerzo su propio estudio en Berlín. Durante los primeros años recibió muy pocos encargos, pero las primeras obras ya mostraban el camino que continuaría durante el resto de su carrera. En 1913, con su esposa Ada Bruhn, se traslada a Werder (a las afueras de Berlín). Allí nacen sus hijas Marianne y Waltrani, y más tarde Dorotea. Hasta entonces las relaciones entre la familia y el trabajo habían sido buenas, pero laPrimera Guerra Mundial de 1914-1918 provocó que Ludwig fuera destinado a Rumania durante este periodo y la familia quedase separada.
En 1922 se hizo miembro del "Novembergruppe" y se puso por nombre Mies van der Rohe. Junto con van Doesburg, Lissitzky y Richter editó en 1923 la revista "G" . A partir de su participación en G, quedó fuertemente influido por el neoplasticismo de van Doesburg. En esos años, trabajó en los planos de dos casas de campo, -una construida en hormigón armado, y otra en ladrillo- cuyos extensos muros y difuminadas líneas revolucionaron el concepto devivienda.

En 1926 fue vicepresidente de la Deutscher Werkbund y llevó a cabo obras de cierta envergadura, como la casa Wolf en Guben, toda de ladrillo, y la casa Hermann Lange en Krefeld. Fue director de la exposición de viviendas de Weissenhof, en Stuttgart en 1927, donde conoció a la diseñadora e interiorista Lilly Reich y diseñó para ella un bloque de viviendas de estructuras de acero. De 1927 a 1930 construyó una villa en Krefeld para el fabricante de sedas Hermann Lange, y en 1929 Mies recibe el encargo de proyectar el Pabellón nacional de Alemania para la Exposición Internacional de Barcelona, para el que diseñó también la famosa silla Barcelona, de acero cromado y cuero.

La Bauhaus sentó las bases normativas y patrones de lo que hoy conocemos como diseño industrial y gráfico; puede decirse que antes de la existencia de la Bauhaus estas dos profesiones no existían tal cual y fueron concebidas dentro de esta escuela. Sin duda la escuela estableció los fundamentos académicos sobre los cuales se basaría en gran medida una de las tendencias más predominantes de la nueva Arquitectura Moderna, incorporando una nueva estética que abarcaría todos los ámbitos de la vida cotidiana: desde la silla en la que usted se sienta hasta la página que está leyendo (Heinrich von Eckardt). Dada su importancia las obras de la Bauhaus en Weimar y Dessau fueron declaradas como Patrimonio de la Humanidad por la Unesco en 1996.
Siendo director Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, la escuela sufrió por el acosante crecimiento del Nacional Socialismo, debido a que la ideología Bauhaus era vista como socialista internacionalista y judía. Los nazis cerraron la escuela.
Muchos de los integrantes de la misma, entre ellos el mismo Walter Gropius, refugiados, se instalan finalmente en Estados Unidos para seguir con sus ideales.





















Me parece que Mies van der Rohe fue uno de esos iluminandos o avanzados de la época al igual que muchos de sus compañeros de oficio, con un estilo muy personalizado y ideología clara en sus diseños, lo cual podia resultar extraño o incluso marciano en ese entonces, pero hoy en día tiene una belleza reconocible y muchos pensariamos que su arquitectura y diseños estan hechos en la actualidad.

Paula Solá

jueves, 19 de marzo de 2015

clase1_William Morris


William Morris (Clay Hill Walthamstow, Inglaterra24 de marzo de 1834 - 3 de octubre de 1896) fue un artesano, impresor, poeta, escritor, activista político, pintor y diseñador británico, fundador del movimiento Arts and Crafts.


Morris estuvo estrechamente vinculado a la Hermandad Prerrafaelita, movimiento que rechazaba la producción industrial en las artes decorativas y la arquitectura, y propugnaba un retorno a la artesanía medieval, considerando que los artesanos merecían el rango de artistas.
El movimiento de artes y oficios pretendía volver a la manufactura artesanal contrastada con la producción industrial de la época y así hacer llegar la cultura a las áreas menos pudientes de la sociedad. Lo que se le reprochó fue que los productos llegaron a ser tan complejos en su fabricación que solo las clases altas pudieron adquirir los ejemplares.
William Morris tuvo, sin lugar a dudas, una gran influencia histórica en las artes visuales y en el diseño industrial del siglo XIX.

Por otro lado destaca su Noticias de ninguna parte, novela utópica muy popular, que narra el paso al socialismo.


Opino que este artista es de los pocos en la historia del arte y del diseño que podemos ver como su trabajo a trascendido de forma tangible en la actualidad, ya que después de cien años de su muerte su empresa de papeles pintados sigue en funcionamiento y es cotizada. 
Tambien me gusta su forma de pensar y podemos comprobar que cuando algo es bello y bueno puede trascender tantisimos años en el timpo, lo cual es una inspiración para mi y incluso para todo el colectivo de creativos del momento.


Paula Solá